Search for: "Wiesman"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2016, 9:26 pm
Wiesman; Alito dissent joined by Roberts and Thomas] Tags: pharmaceuticals, religious liberty, Supreme Court “Court delivers a bitter pill on religious freedom” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 9:47 pm
Wiesman [SCOTUSblog backgrounder], a case challenging a Washington regulation requiring pharmacies to sell birth control despite potential religious objections of employees. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Wiesman, (cert. filed, 1/4/2016). [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:51 am
Wiesman, in which owners of a Washington pharmacy challenged a state rule requiring pharmacies to sell certain abortifacient drugs. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:48 am
Wiesman, (Docket No. 15-682, cert. denied 6/28/2016), but over a 15-page dissent to the denial of certiorari written by Justice Alito and joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:34 am
Wiesman, No. 15-862, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Wiesman, (9th Cir., July 23, 2015), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld against constitutional challenge rules of the Washington Pharmacy Quality Assurance Commission that provide only limited accommodation to pharmacists and pharmacies that object on religious grounds to filling prescriptions for emergency contraception. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:59 am
Wiesman, Justice Alito ends his introductory paragraph (technically, his second paragraph) with this: "If this is a sign of how religious liberty claims will be treated in the years ahead, those who value religious freedom have cause for great concern. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 11:27 am
The sentences are to be served consecutively and Burnett will be ineligible for parole until he serves 85 percent or 51 years.Burnett showed no emotion when Wiesman pronounced sentence. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:41 am
Wiesman’s opinions and conclusions regarding use of force, restraints, and isolation will be excluded because they are analyzed under standards that are not applicable to the defendant. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Wiesman (2016) undermines his opposition to abortion and is a devastating rebuttal to the conservative dissents in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:37 pm
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:16 pm
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:19 pm
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am
In a 42-page decision rejecting the government’s application, Judge Fuentes, in large part, echoed Judge Wiesman’s earlier opinion. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:07 pm
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
Wiesman 15-862Issue: Whether a law prohibiting religiously motivated conduct violates the Free Exercise Clause when it exempts the same conduct when done for a host of secular reasons, has been enforced only against religious conduct, and has a history showing an intent to target religion. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
To combat the rising numbers, the governor and Secretary of Health John Wiesman are changing guidance and regulations around restaurants, bars, and fitness centers as well as weddings and funerals. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
Wiesman, a case in which a drug store operator sought to gain the right, for religious reasons, to refuse to fill doctors’ prescriptions for birth-control. [read post]
